Thoms & Partners har etablerats 2025 med samma advokater och medarbetare från de år vi verkat i Advokatfirman Abersten i Sundsvall. Våra arbetsområden är som tidigare koncentrerade till affärsjuridik, konkurser och brottmål.
Med vår samlade erfarenhet tillhandahåller vi juridisk spetskompetens inom våra specialiserade arbetsområden. Viktigt är även den lokala tillgängligheten för våra klienter, som består av företag, privatpersoner och offentlig verksamhet.
Vi åtar oss uppdrag både för privatpersoner och företag inom bland annat brottmål och familjerättsliga ärenden såsom vårdnad, boende och umgänge samt affärsjuridik, konkurser, kommersiella tvister m.m.
Våra medarbetare är lyhörda och gör alltid sitt yttersta för att hjälpa våra klienter att hitta lösningar på juridiska problem. Merparten av våra företagsklienter har vi jobbat med under många år och vi fungerar ofta som ett juridiskt bollplank i deras dagliga verksamhet.
Samma advokater. Nytt namn.
Vi åtar oss uppdrag som offentlig försvarare och målsägandebiträde
Vi åtar oss uppdrag både som konkursförvaltare och
likvidator
Vi anlitas återkommande vid förhandling av kommersiella avtal och företagsöverlåtelser samt som ombud i affärsjuridiska tvister
Company E, a once-popular restaurant chain, has seen a decline in customer traffic due to changing dining preferences and increased competition from fast-casual dining options. The pandemic further exacerbated its financial woes.
After years of struggling to adapt, Company E announced its bankruptcy, closing multiple locations and laying off staff. The management acknowledged the need for a complete overhaul of their business strategy.
Company D was once a thriving startup in the renewable energy sector, attracting significant investment. However, the company faced challenges in scaling its operations and meeting regulatory requirements.
Despite initial success, Company D struggled to maintain its growth trajectory and ultimately filed for bankruptcy. The founders expressed regret over their inability to navigate the complex landscape of energy regulations.
Company C, a well-known name in the manufacturing industry, has been struggling with operational inefficiencies and rising production costs. The company has been unable to compete with cheaper imports, leading to a steady decline in market share.
After years of losses, Company C filed for bankruptcy, citing unsustainable debt levels and a lack of strategic direction. The management is now focused on liquidating assets to pay off creditors.
Company B was a prominent player in the retail sector, known for its wide range of consumer goods. However, the rise of e-commerce and changing shopping habits have severely impacted its brick-and-mortar sales.
As online shopping became more popular, Company B failed to establish a robust online presence, leading to a significant drop in revenue. The company announced its bankruptcy after failing to secure additional funding to revamp its business model.
Company A, once a leader in the tech industry, has faced significant financial challenges over the past few years. Despite its innovative products, the company struggled to adapt to changing market demands and increasing competition.
In recent quarters, Company A reported declining sales and mounting debts, leading to its decision to file for bankruptcy. The management cited misalignment with consumer preferences and failure to invest in emerging technologies as key factors in their downfall.
